Twitter, Lyft, Stripe Launch Big Layoffs

Some of Silicon Valley’s biggest companies announced significant layoffs last week. What does that mean for the rest of the tech industry?

A week after he acquired Twitter for $44 billion, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk reportedly slashed half the social-media giant’s workforce, equivalent to roughly 3,700 employees. According to Reuters and other news sources, Twitter employees received layoff notices via personal email after being told to stay away from the office on Nov. 4.  

“In an effort to place Twitter on a healthy path, we will go through the difficult process of reducing our global workforce on Friday,” read the company’s Nov. 3 email to all employees. Musk had already terminated many in Twitter’s senior ranks, including its former CEO.

Using the hashtag #OneTeam, many current and former Twitter employees took to the platform to share their stories. “Looks like I’m unemployed y’all,” wrote @SBkcrn, a former Twitter community manager. “Just got remotely logged out of my work laptop and removed from Slack.”

Learn how tech professionals feel about some of the industry’s most important workplace trends – and how the data can help YOU.

Access the Report

“So grateful this is happening at 3am. Really appreciate the thoughtfulness on the timing front guys,” wrote @ChrisYounie, another employee.

Musk’s plans to boost Twitter’s revenue include charging $8 per month for user verification (the famous “blue check mark”) and other features. According to The New York Times, there are other revenue-generating ideas on the table, such as allowing users to send direct messages to “high-profile users” like celebrities for a small fee, along with paywalled video.  

Meanwhile, Lyft announced it would slice 13 percent of its staff, equivalent to 680 employees. According to Axios, company co-founders Logan Green and John Zimmer blamed the layoffs on “the tough reality.”

Payments startup Stripe plans on cutting 14 percent of its workforce. “Our business is fundamentally well-positioned to weather harsh circumstances,” read the company’s explanation, posted on its official blog. “We provide an important foundation to our customers and Stripe is not a discretionary service that customers turn off if budget is squeezed. However, we do need to match the pace of our investments with the realities around us. Doing right by our users and our shareholders (including you) means embracing reality as it is.”

Unlike Twitter’s decision to dismiss employees via mass email, Stripe is apparently committed to doing it via 1:1 meetings. “We are going to set up a live, 1-1 conversation between each departing employee and a Stripe manager over the course of the next day,” the blog added. “If you are in an impacted group, look out for a calendar invitation.”

It’s important to note that many Silicon Valley companies, their profits buoyed by pandemic-era spending on cloud-based services and apps, went on aggressive hiring sprees in 2020 and 2021. Now that the economy has tightened somewhat, those companies are suddenly more mindful of their bottom lines—and that means cuts. But even if the news seems full of layoffs, keep in mind that companies everywhere will still need tech professionals for a variety of functions, from building websites to securing tech stacks against intrusion.   

2 Responses to “Twitter, Lyft, Stripe Launch Big Layoffs”

  1. jake_leone

    The argument that the economy is affecting tech, doesn’t really hold water. You have to look at each company individually.

    Apple: Apple is really missing the mark on new hardware, and they are behind. Apple should be working on home robotics, they aren’t. And the reason is because of a tired CEO who is content to just milk the cash cow. Apple earns a huge profit, on a per employee basis. Apple can foray into automatic content generation and/or home robotics. We can all sense that these 2 upcoming industries (robots for the home and ACG-automatic content generation) are going to be Trillion dollar markets. Why doesn’t Tim Cook sense this? Because Tim Cook is not a visionary, he is the wrong person to be leading Apple. Unless you want Apple to look Xerox or Ampex in a few years.

    Lyft: Lyft faces heavy competition and the workforce isn’t cheap. Hence Lyft will be a money loser. Having said that, its sector could become huge, if self driving cars are perfected and commoditized.

    Stripe: Stripe, don’t know enough about it.

    Twitter: Twitter had a lot of dead wood. But still, in order for Twitter to compete they will need engineers. ACG (automatic content generation) is going to be big. And, Twitter needs to attract celebrities. To my mind, the best strategy is for Elon to scare liberals into enacting a statute that makes Social Media the Public Square (otherwise, Elon, you have to please advertisers with in-place content monitoring and censorship). Taking Kathy Griffin off of Twitter is a start, but you probably have to scare some politicians.
    If, Twitter is forced into the Public Square by Federal Statute, the equal protection clause will bring them all in, probably even much of the supporting services (AWS, Apple, Microsoft) will be in there. At that point, advertisers will stop considering content moderation as a platform requirement (much as they currently do with bill boards and other signage).
    At that point, anything goes, and providing the users a firewall to stop unwanted messages (which most Social Media services already provide) is all that is needed. The adult world of Free Speech can go on, unhindered by the demands of 3rd party advertisers and activist content providers (or more likely, the political activism of (conservative or liberal) employees, executives, and CEOs).

    • Apple: No you’re wrong, Robots? Automation? Arm chair stock chaser
      Lyft: No you’re wrong again, self driving cars don’t work
      Stripe: Then don’t say anything
      Twitter: Blah blah “I’m a Arm chair stock chaser or commenter”

      Lay off the drugs man