Google or Goldman Sachs? Developers Talk Finance vs. FAANG

Where would you rather work: Goldman Sachs, or one of the FAANGs (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Alphabet)?

According to many technologists, FAANGs are the better bet. However, engineers working at Goldman say this really isn’t so.

The case against technology jobs at Goldman Sachs is laid out in a long September thread on Blind, which anonymously surveys technologists. Titled, “The Truth About Goldman Sachs,” it features a technologist who claims to work for the financial giant, and details all the complaints of the technologists who work there.

Among those complaints: Assertions that technologists at Goldman are less highly esteemed than the traders in the front office, that Goldman hours are long (50-60 a week) and 7:30 A.M. meetings are not unheard of, that the politics can be intense, that the pay is lower, that you don’t get a laptop, that it can take a long time to get things done, that there’s no free food, and that Goldman wants people back in the office while the tech industry veers toward remote and hybrid work.

None of this sounds great, and it’s unsurprising that the responses to Blind’s post are full of people saying things like, “I don’t think anyone in FANG ever considers joining GS.”

However, there are people at Goldman with a different story.

Some of them were in evidence in Goldman’s remote session for aspiring engineers last week. Given that the session was a Goldman recruiting event, participants probably weren’t entirely neutral… but they made some convincing points all the same.

Jordan Giebas, an analyst on Goldman’s New York strats team who joined after completing a Master’s in Science in Computational Finance from Carnegie Mellon, said his friends in tech have far more limiting roles. For example, they might spend hours working on a single icon in a consumer OS. By comparison, he’s working on a system that tries to capture data on the asychronicities that occur when the London markets are open and New York markets are closed. “The things we work on here are so much more far-reaching,” he pointed out. 

It was a perspective echoed by Steve Ekert, one of Goldman’s U.S. campus recruiters for engineering. “In tech, you can be one of 100 people working on a button that you will never get to meet the end user of,” Ekert said. “Here, you might be working for an end user on a trading desk who’s sitting next to you.”

Goldman’s participating engineers also stressed the variability of the roles at GS. “It’s so vast that if you don’t like a project you’re working on, you can make a switch,” said Urvashi Sharma, a software engineer at the firm. “My former team and my new team are completely different. If you don’t like a project you’re working on, you can make a switch… You can have a number of different careers within Goldman.”

Goldman’s junior engineers also emphasized the technology they work with (Kubernetes, public cloud) and the extent to which they’re given significant early responsibility.  Melissa Ding, a technologist in human capital management, said she was the primary engineer on a new registration system for recruiting events despite only working at the firm for a year.

“I was in full charge of the stack. It was cool to take ownership of a project that made a lot of impact,” said Ding, adding that, despite being junior, she was able to work with software vendors and consultants from outside the firm.

A modified version of this article originally appeared in eFinancialCareers.

One Response to “Google or Goldman Sachs? Developers Talk Finance vs. FAANG”

  1. The impression I was left with after reading this article, is that working for GS is like working for a startup where they throw whatever they can at you no matter your experience lvl. Also, several paragraphs just repeat over and over at the end and should have been caught before being published.