Techs Protest End of Microsoft’s Masters Certifications

Microsoft’s decision to end Masters level certification exams has generated a flurry of protests from IT professionals, some already upset over the demise of the company’s TechNet Subscription program.

certificationMicrosoft said the Masters program has only generated “a few hundred” new certifications over the past few years and reached “only a tiny proportion of the overall community,” according to a Microsoft executive quoted in InfoWorld.

The certifications tests that will end Oct. 1 are Microsoft Certified Master, Microsoft Certified Solutions Master and Microsoft Certified Architect, previously the top-level certifications for IT professionals working with Redmond’s products.

Those who already hold the certifications will keep them and won’t be required to periodically re-certify, according to an email sent to program participants.

Ending the Master program comes only two months after Microsoft announced the end of the TechNet Subscription service, which among other things made low-cost software available to IT staff and developers. It ended August 31.

Taken together, Microsoft’s actions mean “hard times ahead for Microsoft consultants,” said one commenter to a TechNet blog post.

A poll created on Microsoft Connect showed wide support for maintaining the certifications, with 692 votes in favor to only 11 opposed, as of Tuesday afternoon.

But while a strong majority is upset by Microsoft’s actions, others say good riddance to a program they could not participate in or afford. Wrote one opponent:

I am from China. This program is for an elite group of people from U.S.A., Canada and Europe … For people like me to take the exam for $2,500 (this is 5 years of savings for us). On top of it, I have to fly to go to an authorized test center to take the exams.

Worse, the user said, the Masters program works against the values Microsoft appears to be seeking to promote in the developing world.

Certifications are great, but the way the master program targets people from the developed countries is not at all compatible with Microsoft’s values which are generally anti-discriminatory and enhancing equality of opportunities.



7 Responses to “Techs Protest End of Microsoft’s Masters Certifications”

September 04, 2013 at 3:00 pm, Frank said:

Microsoft is destined to oblivium but beforethat it will be a hecatomb of their sacred cows unless the C level executives act radical in the right direction. Maybe is not too late yet.


September 04, 2013 at 11:55 pm, Jim F said:

I was an early MCSE (first 2000, globally – ok that’s kind of early).

Over the years I’ve found it impossible to keep up with these certifications. Things just change too quickly.


September 05, 2013 at 9:55 am, John said:

I got my MCSE 2003. I spent thousands of dollars and countless hours of studying. It has not paid off at all. I tried to update my Microsoft certs and Microsoft has not played fair on their testing. Any Microsoft book you buy will not be related to what’s on the test. The new testing format is unfair to ALL test takers. Microsoft certifications are just a piece of paper now. I like reading the books, but the trick questions and unfair testing format has made me look at other non Microsoft certs.


September 05, 2013 at 12:34 pm, Curt Spanburgh said:

So how are all you people with your Redhat certifications doing?


September 05, 2013 at 12:36 pm, Curt Spanburgh said:

Certifications are required for MSFT Partnership core competency.

Certs have their place. That said, it seems that taking test is a skill set in itself and the testing programs seem to be design to generate income.


September 05, 2013 at 2:01 pm, Dude said:

Curt Spanburgh: Cert can not be required because certs are no longer available.


September 12, 2013 at 1:38 pm, Unca Alby said:

Certifications are over-hyped in the first place. Most employers are looking for a “must have” N years of experience, and a “nice to have” certification. it is rare to see it the other way around.


Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published.